🔗 Share this article

The last time the Russian President traveled to the South Asian nation four years ago, the global landscape looked entirely distinct. The brief visit, curtailed by the pandemic, centered around talks on strategic and defense cooperation between the two leaders.

Months later, the large-scale military offensive of Ukraine would turn the Russian leader into a global pariah, significantly restricting his diplomatic travel.

Additionally, that period preceded a major change in ties between Washington and Delhi, marked by contentious rhetoric and the imposition of heavy import duties.

"In this context, the importance of Putin's journey to meet Modi is profound, serving as a signal of enduring ties and a defiance of outside coercion," experts emphasize.

A Critical Juncture for Two Major Powers

The summit occurs at a crucial time. The Kremlin leader comes after dismissing latest peace proposals for Ukraine, bolstered by reported gains by Russian forces.

"For Russia, the primary importance of this engagement is its simple happening," commented a prominent analyst based in Moscow. "It suggests a return to something resembling routine global diplomacy."

For India, the stakes are particularly elevated. The country navigates a challenging geopolitical climate, characterized by a semi-isolationist United States, a weakened Russia, and an increasingly powerful China.

This delicate balance was underscored just before the visit, when senior Western diplomats released a public commentary questioning Russia's commitment to peace. This prompted a sharp response from Indian officials, who labeled it an unacceptable diplomatic practice.

The Enduring Challenge from the North

The India-Russia bond originates from the Cold War era and is firmly rooted, with Moscow historically being Delhi's primary arms provider. This relationship was generally accepted by the West until a change in approach.

Over time, Western nations ignored India's large-scale buying of discounted Russian oil. Yet, recently failed peace efforts, accusations mounted, leading to punitive tariffs and a significant downturn in transatlantic relations with Delhi.

"In response, India has returned to its default strategy of 'hedging'," noted a foreign policy expert. "This demonstrates to the US that it has other choices and is observing how the global dynamics settle."

Apart from international politics, India's core motivation with Russia is its strategic location. "China continues to be the primary security challenge to India, and for decades, India has depended on Russia as a continental balancer against China," the analyst stated.

The deepening partnership between Russia and China has caused concern in Delhi, prompting efforts to avoid an unbreakable bond between its northern neighbor and its longtime partner.

This concern has also spurred India's drive to diversify its defense procurement, shrinking its dependence on Russian equipment from about 70% to a reduced portion in the past few years.

"Delhi will try to strike a balance: buy sufficient Russian weaponry to maintain the alliance, but avoid overly reliant that a sudden cutoff would cripple its defenses," the analyst remarked.

Energy and Economic Ties

Enhanced economic cooperation is expected to be a key agenda item. President Putin has recently emphasized plans to elevate cooperation with India to a "higher plane", defying Western sanctions.

The matter of crude oil imports is pivotal. Although the Indian government has stated to continue buying Russian oil, recent restrictions have slowed activity from the private sector. At the same time, India has moved to increase imports of American oil and gas.

A Kremlin spokesperson admitted "hurdles" in energy trade but insisted it would proceed without major disruption. The official downplayed the effect of sanctions, stating they would cause only "minor" and "temporary" disruptions and that Russia possesses the "technology" to bypass such measures.

Diplomatic Constraints

When the two leaders sit down, the topic of Ukraine is expected to be addressed mainly through India's consistent appeal for a peaceful resolution.

"While the Indian leader can speak to both sides, India lacks the diplomatic clout to significantly influence the war," the analyst noted. "Aside from urging negotiations, its ability to make a difference is constrained."

Ultimately, notwithstanding the public displays of camaraderie between the two leaders, the partnership is at its core one of "pure realpolitik," driven by cold calculation in a rapidly changing world.